Does Palin Really Matter Anymore?
July 6, 2009
Without Banisters on what someone who is not extremely familiar with a subject can offer:
France and Germany and Australia and India and China all have plenty of brilliant historians of their own, who operate with far more easy access to the archives and insider knowledge of their countries and regions than we Americans do — so what can we offer that justifies working on their parts of the world? Outsiders’ questions — “what’s the big deal?” “why do people here do this, and not that?” “why doesn’t anyone ever talk about x?” — are one of the few things, in my opinion, that we genuinely have to offer.
I actually think WB isn’t valuing the “dumb question” enough. Palin’s recent resignation from the Alaska governorship is a great example. How many people have really asked who cares about Palin now?
Let’s take the outsider’s view. This is a governor who wasn’t that good at her job, who is clearly not that smart, and clearly more than a little mean and a little tacky. She’s decided for whatever reason that she doesn’t want to finish her term anymore. That’s the core of the story. But then the fact that she’s pretty and different than other vice presidential candidates comes into play which earns Palin’s every move a bit more value in the press’s eyes because it’s juicy gossip disguised as politics and the public loves it. It gets readers’/viewers’ attention. But does anybody in the press really think that she has a chance at the presidency? I mean really?
I’ve been following Palin’s lifetime on the national stage since its beginning and from what I can tell, the reason people like her or like to watch her is either:
a) Because she slightly satiates that craving that everyone who has a political opinion hungers for these days: to have their own inspiring, young, smart, handsome, candidate leading that represents that party’s values and tempts others to fall in line. She allows people to pretend that there’s another Barack Obama out there for conservatives.
or
b) Because it’s a break from the stodginess of politics. Everybody likes a little goofy-Desperate-Housewives-Real-Wives-Of-Wherever, even politicos and Washington insiders —hell, especially politicos and Washington insiders.
The questions that should be being asked now though is either Why does what Palin does now matter? or Why not actually watch The Real Wives of New Jersey instead of The Real Wife of Alaska?
You wrote “This is a governor who wasn’t that good at her job…”
Good discussions start with getting the facts right.
Gov. Palin did more for Alaska than most governors do for their states in eight years.
Take for example, when Alaska got a windfall oil revenue, instead of squandering it like all the other states squandered their bonus property tax revenue from the bubble in real estate value, Palin kept the size of government small and distributed the cash to the taxpayers directly in checks in the mail!!
When property taxes declined when the real estate bubble ended, other states are going bankrupt. Not Alaska, because she kept the government from doing an Obama-bloat.
You will see how wrong you are as Palin continues to dominate the news from today through November 2012.
You might enjoy noting that most wordpress.com comments on Palin are ingnorantly critical, yet nearly half of all Americans approve of her.
It’s highly questionable that all of the other 49 states ever received much of a bonus. You could probably build a case for Nevada, Florida, California and a few others, but not for Wisconsin or West Virginia. Furthermore, how exactly did they all squander it? Where’d the money go – unhelpful social programs, marginal-utility infrastructure (e.g, Bridge to Nowhere), basic inflation, rising fuel prices? There are thousands of possibilities. And how is ’squandering’ it (in an undefined fashion) much better than giving it to taxpayers? Wouldn’t the government be better off dumping it back into education or transit infrastructure, instead of making sure everyone can afford a bigger TV?
Ummm I’ve got to say that you’re the one who has the facts wrong. For instance, the “Obama-bloat” you’re talking about I assume to be the stimulus? She actually ended up accepting almost all the stimulus. She didn’t keep the government from anything.
And it’s also interesting that you say that she was a good governor (by interesting I mean wrong). It seems the Alaskan people don’t think so. Link here:
http://community.adn.com/adn/node/140971
So yes, good discussions do start with getting the facts right, perhaps you’d like to get the facts right?
Also, good discussions involve proper spelling. Ignorantly is spelled with the ‘g’ before the ‘n’. Just FYI
Continuing further off Without Banisters’ line of thought: I think Palin’s biggest problem was that she was never curious enough about anything to ask any question, dumb or otherwise. Bush was proof positive that provincial smugness and comfort with one’s own ignorance are no good for a nation at all.
Who cares about Paling now? It seems like a lot of people still do.
There’s not really a reason to.